In class, we discussed the alternating threads of Libra, the parts which follow Lee Harvey Oswald's life, and the sections which follow the conception of an attempt on the president's life by ex CIA agents (the "plot plot"). I would argue there's a third story being told here, a third message Delillo is trying to convey. As someone writing about a topic (and presenting a view on said topic) that is commonly considered the realm of crazy conspiracy theorists, he also has to convince the reader to take his novel seriously. I think he so far has accomplished that goal very well, using a number of tactics.
First, is his portrayal of Oswald. He doesn't just seem like the kind of crazy guy who would try to shoot the president (though he does very very much seem like that guy) he also seems like the kind of guy who would be susceptible to suggestion. In his early years, Lee's obsession with Marxist literature makes me see him as someone desperately searching for a group to identify with. He loves the "idea" of Russia, not just the vastness of it. He looks around himself in New Orleans and doesn't see anyone he connects with, but then he reads his Marx and believes he's found someone with a similar way of thinking, a similar intellect. Whether or not he would get along with Marx is besides the point, its just important that Lee is looking for a cause and a group he can be a part of. We see this later in Japan when he's finally found somewhere he feels comfortable and is so relieved he tries to maim himself to stay there. Also in Japan, we meet Konno, who introduces us to the idea that when a smart, older man listens to Lee and talks to him about politics, Lee will be very receptive. He might even be willing to betray his country to that older man's association, which could be of use later.
Second, in the other narrative, Delillo works to paint the CIA agents as real people with legitimate motives, not the vague, unnamed members of organizations with somber names like "CIA", "FBI" and "Illuminati". I think Delillo distances his story from conspiracy theories by subverting those tropes we associate with such theories. He doesn't portray the CIA acting unanimously, he gives us Win Everett, a man with a wife and daughter resenting his forced retirement. He gives us T-Jay Mackey, a man who may have PTSD from the Bay of Pigs, who felt personally abandoned by his government there. He gives us Laurence "Larry" Parmenter, who "hummed something that amused him". These are people. And we see their (not unreasonable) plot build from the ground up.
I agree with your statement that DeLillo offers compelling evidence to the CIA conspiracy argument. As a 4th grader obsessed with presidents, I had always thought that it was simply Oswald who shot JFK, but now when I revisit the issue it seems very compelling that Oswald, with interests in communism (and later Cuba itself) would be chosen as part of a CIA plot like this.
ReplyDeleteI also found it very interesting how the dynamic forms between the CIA's involvement with Lee and the story of Lee as the lone shooter. The fact that the CIA involvement is really just the plots of disgraced agents and disgruntled ex-CIA people does serve to make the story more believable in my opinion. Its like you said in the post, the CIA isnt portrayed as some illuminati-esque secret society that conspires to kill the president and take over the gorvernment.
ReplyDeleteI am interested to see how these two narratives tie together. What I am really curious about is to see what changes in the plan that causes Kennedy to be killed. Is it Oswald acting on his own? Does Mackey decide he hates Kennedy that much? Whatever it is I bet Delillo provides an interesting answer.
ReplyDeleteI definitely see Oswald as malleable as you describe. He seems to just want attention, just want to be loved, which makes him seem more "real" and have more motives. Also, how you describe the CIA again makes them seem relate-able and "real." The the mix of fact and fiction makes this story seem probable and possible, not just a crazy conspiracy theory.
ReplyDeleteI think DeLillo does a spectacular job in making this novel believable and something to be taken seriously. It would be very easy for a book like this to just be seen as describing yet another crazy conspiracy theory in a modern culture that already has so many, but his writing avoids this. He slowly builds the novel from the ground up with a lot of detail, making all the characters seem extremely realistic, and the plot does seem like something that could definitely happen in the universe he's built. DeLillo doesn't give us a crazy blanket statement like "the CIA killed Kennedy," he builds independent characters with the motivations and the power to plan this and shows how they try to pull it off, which makes it seem very real.
ReplyDelete